Post #7
Posted on 08 March 2010
There seem to be two questions: (a) Is 'political' art useless? (b) Is all art politically useless?
(a): Inclined to say yes, since it tends toward the trite and inert; on the other hand, many active protest groups take inspiration from situationism etc. (dunno if what they do qualifies as art, though), so maybe the problem is more with the media employed than with the aim of being political.
(b): Inclined to say no, at least if the artist isn't primarily motivated by money. Politics is about power in all its manifestations; thus, lots of art is politically pertinent insofar as it questions established power dynamics (link here to point about minimalism?). Also, personal=political?
One might also argue that the very act of making art is a political statement (an assertion of value independent of price?) – though only in the absence of the commodification alluded to above.
Really, to answer either question, we need a sharper idea of what it is to be politically effective.